<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Opinionated - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-786fc808" type="application/json"/><link>http://kteare.disqus.com/</link><description>Keith Teare's Weblog</description><atom:link href="http://kteare.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:26:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is it me or is the Beijing 2008 Olympics Medal Table being &amp;#8220;Americanized&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/08/18/is-it-me-or-is-the-beijing-2008-olympics-medal-table-being-americanized/#comment-159031972</link><description>American Ted Ligety was fourth matching his career best Cup result in the discipline from 2006—the same year he won the gold medal in combined at the Olympics. Ligety said he was pleased with his super G leg, but felt he could have done more with&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fertility medicine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:26:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time Streams</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2009/05/real-time-streams/#comment-133208363</link><description>it's beautiful</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Svetha Goud</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:38:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon 5D Mk II and Nikon D3X and Hitler &amp;#8211; Hilarious</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/12/canon-5d-mk-ii-and-nikon-d3x-and-hitler-hilarious/#comment-103174482</link><description>I couldn't have said it better..&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">black friday nikon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 23:13:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: De-portalization and Internet Revenues I</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/09/de-portalization-and-internet-revenues-2/#comment-95404449</link><description>Nice post to hang on. I really loved it the way of the stuff provided in this article. This has given very useful information.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carolyn joseph</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: De-portalization and Internet Revenues I</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/09/de-portalization-and-internet-revenues-2/#comment-23844383</link><description>Great graphical explanation. I think it will be nice when Google get's "flattened" a little bit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Kuns</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:28:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook has a problem with pictures of Breast feeding?</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/12/facebook-has-a-problem-with-pictures-of-breast-feeding/#comment-22956194</link><description>Is this for groups all over facebook or just that one group who makes a game of seeing how far they can test Facebook and the report feature?  That group isn't exactly the nicest group of people and they're pretty much a joke now considering the attitudes and snarky behavior a lot of them have toward anyone who things differently from them.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I used to be a part of that group until I grew fed up with the immaturity of some of these other mothers.  I thought the group was for support and hints and tips but it's mostly just instigating and people trying to think up ways to ruin Facebook.  Then when some of them get banned or suspended from the site for their poor behavior, some of the others complain to facebook and act as though they never instigated anything!  Very sad.  I honestly don't know how some of these people can be so negative and nasty when they should be celebrating their healthy happy babies.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Dr. P Rapoport, Facebook has never claimed that women's breasts are always obscene and pornographic and harmful to children.  Facebook actually DOES support breastfeeding, try taking a look at other facebook breastfeeding pages and not just the one at the top of the list for once.  You guys instigate facebook and other users constantly and then wonder why you get in trouble when caught.  There have been discussions on that breastfeeding group where they talk and giggle about how they can instigate Facebook and post as many graphic photos as they can to see what happens, THEN they complain when the photos are removed.  Why should we all take a group like that seriously when there are plenty of other groups who have breastfeeding photos complete with nipple showing, who have nice quiet pleasant groups and are civil to each other and actually help others?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook has a problem with pictures of Breast feeding?</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/12/facebook-has-a-problem-with-pictures-of-breast-feeding/#comment-22935671</link><description>Fine project.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;You shouldn't be joking about reason no. 2, because it's correct. There's more than that going on; this issue has been analyzed some in the media and on our site (which has at least one of those photos: &lt;a href="http://www.tera.ca/photos6.html)" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.tera.ca/photos6.html)&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Facebook pretends to have a policy but doesn't. It deletes photos arbitrarily and capriciously and then blames others for what it does.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Facebook pretends to support breastfeeding, but it doesn't; and that's not its mandate anyhow.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Facebook claims that women's breasts are always obscene and pornographic and harm children.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I've written about this many times and so will stop here with that brief summary.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr. P. Rapoport</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:45:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook has a problem with pictures of Breast feeding?</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/12/facebook-has-a-problem-with-pictures-of-breast-feeding/#comment-22917479</link><description>Beautiful photos. I wish I had taken more photos.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shelly Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: De-portalization and Internet Revenues I</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/09/de-portalization-and-internet-revenues-2/#comment-22813980</link><description>Your drift that the future interner growth will be search-driven rather than content-driven is trenchant presaging. I think the foothills are already getting to become more and more dominant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bsmotoring</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:19:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: De-portalization and Internet Revenues I</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/09/de-portalization-and-internet-revenues-2/#comment-21933407</link><description>Loved the graphics used to interpret these revenues. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Online Recruitment</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:43:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manchester United 2 Arsenal 0</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2002/12/08/manchester-united-2-arsenal-0/#comment-21246521</link><description>Your blog post is too nice of football. If you want good entertainment and want to get enjoyment of live matches of pool then get &lt;a href="http://www.footballclubtickets.bz" rel="nofollow"&gt;Arsenal Tickets&lt;/a&gt; in online market for more enjoyment of holidays.  &lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">footballworldcuptickets</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:54:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: De-portalization and Internet Revenues I</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/09/de-portalization-and-internet-revenues-2/#comment-20095183</link><description>many people want it , internet revenues.I am.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">valves supplier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:34:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it me or is the Beijing 2008 Olympics Medal Table being &amp;#8220;Americanized&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/08/18/is-it-me-or-is-the-beijing-2008-olympics-medal-table-being-americanized/#comment-17730683</link><description>It's you.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Just kidding.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;This is a very very long debate which goes far beyond my country is better than yours.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Officially, the IOC is forbidden to release medal tables by their charter.  There is no OFFICIAL version from the IOC.  They've been 'unofficially' releasing them since about 1992, and then in the 'gold first' standard.  Some smaller countries like gold first as they can get just 1 gold and move quite far up the table, ahead of a country that has say 3 silvers and 7 bronzes.  Others hate gold first as it is being used as an excuse to cut funding for non-gold possible sports.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I blogged about it yesterday here and you should also read the WSJ piece on this (the link is in my post--don't want to post two links as that will spam catch this comment)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://penguinsix.com/2008/08/18/the-olympic-medal-table-race-more-golds-or-more-medals/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://penguinsix.com/2008/08/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">penguinsix</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:28:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technology Blog Valuations &amp;#8211; Getting to be Real!</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/07/technology-blog-valuations-getting-to-be-real/#comment-17730668</link><description>I don't disagree with that point Rafat. I made an update above to reflect your point.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith Teare</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technology Blog Valuations &amp;#8211; Getting to be Real!</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2008/07/technology-blog-valuations-getting-to-be-real/#comment-17730666</link><description>Keith
&lt;br&gt;you of all people should know better..please go to our corporate site: &lt;a href="http://www.contentnext.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.contentnext.com/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;check out everything that comprises our whole company...and this doesn't even include some of our newer conferences, our research reports and our near term plans.
&lt;br&gt;we are not commenting on the price, but at least look at the full picture...this is like saying TechCrunch the company is only one site, and none of its other sprawling businesses...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rafat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: edgeio</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2006/02/13/edgeio/#comment-17730525</link><description>Keith,&lt;br&gt;Congratulations to the you and the team this looks like it will be a big idea!&lt;br&gt;I like the concept of a distributed database/query system.  This is very clever, using RSS as a way to "publish" sharable data is great.  &lt;br&gt;I do hope the "tags" are xml rather than a defining a new protocol.&lt;br&gt;Let us know when we can get a peek at the API.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:52:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Q4 2005 Earnings &amp;#8211; Stock slumps 15% in after market</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2006/01/31/google-q4-2005-earnings-stock-slumps-15-in-after-market/#comment-17730524</link><description>Brave man!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ivan007</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EarningsCast doing great</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2005/03/13/earningscast-doing-great/#comment-17730500</link><description>Earnings calls on the ipod, just one more reason people don't hvae to talk to each other on the subway.  I love it!  Eat your heart out audible!    
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I'm new to all of this, but how do I get the earningscast setup into my ipodder program?  I have manually downloaded every one of the earnings calls for the site, but if you have a podcast that updates every time you add another call then I'm interested in setting that up.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Also, though you might be interested, GE offers a podcast for their earnings.  Here's the link: 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ge.com/en/company/investor/webcast/webcast_04152005.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ge.com/en/company/i...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Do you know if anybody else does?  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Thanks.  Best.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;-Bryan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 20:18:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RSSBuys.com</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2005/04/28/rssbuyscom/#comment-17730501</link><description>Keith,
&lt;br&gt;That's great - pump it up! 
&lt;br&gt;Your link &lt;a href="http://www.rssbuys.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.rssbuys.com&lt;/a&gt; above is broken.
&lt;br&gt;Cheers,
&lt;br&gt;Ivan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ivan007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EarningsCast doing great</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2005/03/13/earningscast-doing-great/#comment-17730498</link><description>Earningscast is awesome, a much-needed service.  Thank you for posting these online.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I've been posting about a comment I heard Larry Page make on Google's call last week.  I don't have it verbatim, but he said that Google would do for TV what they did for the Web.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I'll check the mp3 for his exact words, but to me this sounds a lot more profound than just indexing closed captioning or partering with TiVo.  For what it's worth, I posted some thoughts on &lt;a href="http://www.buygoogle.com/2005/04/google-tv.html" rel="nofollow" title="Google TV"&gt; to spark some discussion.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Many thanks for earningscast!&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mahlon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:43:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EarningsCast doing great</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2005/03/13/earningscast-doing-great/#comment-17730497</link><description>Hi James
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The advice I have had is that these calls are "on the public record" and that so long as I record the call rather than take a file produced by a third party then there are no copyright issues.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;It's probably a borderline case but it seems unlikely that a company - faced with SEC rules requiring equal access for all investors - would go after us.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Any insights you have would be welcome though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:28:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EarningsCast doing great</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2005/03/13/earningscast-doing-great/#comment-17730496</link><description>Love the site. Are you sure that it is not illegal to post MP3's corporations conference calls?
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Just wondering,
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;James</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jharris9999</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EarningsCast doing great</title><link>http://www.teare.com/2005/03/13/earningscast-doing-great/#comment-17730495</link><description>Extra ] in that URL there!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ivan007</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:09:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
